Running the stadium steps is not ‘fun’

Written by Adrian
On February 19, 2020
Categories: AP | College Board
@APStudents Tweet

I don’t know who is manning the @APforStudents Twitter account, but if this tweet is anything to go by, then they know NOTHING about AP chemistry!

@APStudents TweetSo what’s my point here? An opportunity to have a pop at the College Board? No, not really. I don’t care who runs that account, nor even why such an account exists (presumably it’s for marketing purposes). It’s not even my well-documented unhappiness that inorganic chemistry, i.e., the chemistry of the actual elements themselves is virtually non-existent in AP Chemistry that drives me here, rather there’s an entirely different reason for highlighting this. This tweet caught my eye because it’s so typical of prospective AP chemistry students, their parents, and educators who are clueless about the real academic rigor, and content involved.

Over the years I’ve heard countless kids say things like, “I love chemistry”, or “I love science”. At best this shows an almost total ignorance of what chemistry (or science) actually entails, and at worst it misleads them into taking an AP chemistry course that they believe is one thing when it’s actually something entirely different. What such statements usually boil down to is, “I like watching Bill Nye perform the elephant’s toothpaste demo on the Jimmy Fallon show‘, or, ‘I like to make red-cabbage indicator in a home school environment’. Sometimes parents will say, ‘Johnny has always enjoyed, and done well in science’. That statement generally comes with no notion of the fact that what they’ve done in a previous ‘science’ course, often has no bearing upon what’s about to bite them hard in AP.

AP chemistry is not ‘fun’ – at least not in the way that most people define that word. This is true on multiple levels, but here’s the truth. What’s ‘fun’ is the satisfaction, and scholarly stimulus that can be derived from a serious, intellectual pursuit, of a demanding subject that is most definitely not ‘for all’.

The simplest analogy is a sporting one. Winning the championship is certainly ‘fun’; the miserable two-a-days, stadium step running, repetitive drills, freezing cold practices, and coach baratements generally are not. Getting to win the championship is NOT easy, nor is it ‘fun’, but in the end, it’s worth it. AP chemistry is often not ‘fun’, and it’s not filled with elephant’s toothpaste demos and red cabbage indicators – if it is then something is wrong. The sooner that all parties realize that, the more satisfaction (via the acceptance of the reality of the situation), that they will derive from the true ‘fun’ of the (at sometimes) tremendous struggle. The struggle is hard, and that’s what makes it worth it – indeed that’s what makes it ‘fun’. I know this because it is very rare for a an AP student of mine to say, ‘this is fun’ when they are in my class. On the other hand, it’s almost without exception that they reflect after the event and say, ‘that was one of the most valuable educational experiences of my academic career’.

4 Comments

  1. Cedric Bullard

    I so agree. I had a group of administrators who “decided that the best way to increase the rigor of Chemistry was for us to also offer AP Chem. The first year I had 13 very bright and willing students. I announced to them that while they most likely would all get 1’s, they would in fact be better science students for the experience. Sure enough, all but one got a 1. However, out of that group came 2 nuclear engineers, a biochemist/economist, an environmental scientist, an english teacher, and the remainder were all college graduates who found fun in making their college chemistry course something they could feel confident taking.
    Since that year, down the toilet. Guidance got the feeling that kids who had never had chem should take AP Chem and I could just fold the skills they needed into the course as we went along. Absolute hogwash. But Johnny has always made an A in science so what are you doing wrong? We don’t offer it anymore and have focused on a second non AP chemistry class that focuses more on the labs of AP Chem without the test.

    Reply
    • Adrian

      Why did, “13 very bright and willing students” all get 1’s??

      Reply
  2. Andrew

    I really love this post. It is something all students and their parents should read.

    When students come into high school chemistry they always ask, “Are we going to be exploding things?” They expect only/always the Bill Nye or Steve Spangler. I have I heard countless times, “Johnny has always enjoyed, and done well in science”, while in my class he is not enjoying it or doing well.

    I will definitely emphasize the last two paragraphs with students and their parents.

    Reply
    • Adrian

      Thanks Andrew, I think it’s vitally important.

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *